Program application needs screening
Awaiting approval · By tomorrow
OwnerProgram coordinator
Prepared for Kayla Nickerson · FASD 2026
A calmer operating day for Highlands Soil & Water Conservation District
Highlands Soil & Water Conservation District soil & water conservation district supporting agriculture, natural-resource stewardship and cost-share programs in Highlands. This prototype shows how a focused operating queue could help Kayla Nickerson's organization coordinate routine work with clearer ownership and human review.
Designed around service to landowners, conservation staff, and funding partners.
-
01
Standardize program and cost-share intakeDesigned for landowners, conservation staff, and funding partners.
-
02
Prepare site visits from complete case filesDesigned for landowners, conservation staff, and funding partners.
-
03
Assemble grant evidence throughout the projectSuggested first pilot for Highlands Soil & Water Conservation District.
Today’s operating queue
Every request has a next step
Site visit packet incomplete
Needs review · This week
OwnerConservation specialist
Practice verification follow-up
Ready to assign · Today
OwnerField reviewer
Grant evidence due
In progress · Next 4 hours
OwnerGrant manager
Workflow studio
See the handoffs before automating them
Choose a routine workflow, then advance the fictional demonstration through intake, human review, and a prepared output.
Interactive fictional example
Program intake
- Capture applicant, practice, and eligibility facts for Highlands Soil & Water Conservation DistrictUses approved or fictional inputs
- Check required documents and service areaRequires named human review
- Create a complete screening summaryUses approved or fictional inputs
Demo 1 uses fictional operational data and requires Program coordinator approval.
Interactive fictional example
Site-visit preparation
- Collect maps, prior notes, and objectives for Highlands Soil & Water Conservation DistrictUses approved or fictional inputs
- Flag missing permissions and measurementsRequires named human review
- Produce a field-ready visit packetUses approved or fictional inputs
Demo 2 uses fictional operational data and requires Conservation specialist approval.
Interactive fictional example
Grant reporting
- Index approved activity and expense evidence for Highlands Soil & Water Conservation DistrictUses approved or fictional inputs
- Check period, category, and narrative supportRequires named human review
- Assemble a draft grant reportUses approved or fictional inputs
Demo 3 uses fictional operational data and requires Field reviewer approval.
Efficiency case
Small changes, measurable operations
Illustrative targets—not promises—to test against a real baseline.
Illustrative staff time returned
Estimate to validate during a pilot
Handoffs made visible
Owners and review gates shown in one queue
Target work visibility
Illustrative share of routine work with a current status
90-day pilot
Start narrow. Keep people accountable.
A low-risk path from process mapping to an evidence-based decision.
- 1
Days 1–30
Map and baseline
One conservation program - 2
Days 31–60
Run with human review
Add site-visit packet automation - 3
Days 61–90
Measure and decide
Measure incomplete applications and reporting rework